Seven Habits of Highly Effective Mediocre Writers

Mediocrity is frowned upon, yet we are all mediocre.

I am a mediocre writer. I have not written anything that stands out. When I walk past, no one says, “Whoa! Here goes the writer of this year’s bestseller.”

I have failed at more things than I have succeeded at.

But I am still effective. I am still standing in the arena. Being mediocre is not being lazy or being dumb. Mediocrity is understanding that not everyone can be at the top. A vast majority of the people are in the middle of the bell curve, and many are by choice.

Mediocrity means I am giving time and attention to many other important things in my life than just writing. I might get better over the years. And even if I don’t, I still can be effective. I can learn to be a good marketeer and sell my work in innovative ways. I might become a good teacher and leave my mark by teaching others. Or I might learn to be more productive and generate more in less time.

I feel no shame in being mediocre. You too can excel in your mediocrity if you can cultivate these seven habits.

Be consistent.

If there is one quality mediocre writers should pursue more than any other, it is to write consistently.

There is only one thing that separates the winners from losers; winners never give up. Even when nobody is reading your work, even when you don’t know what to write, even when you know your work is not up to the mark, if you keep on writing consistently, you will get better.

More than anything else, quantity leads to quality. Daily writing will make you better.

Persistence is not just a self-help cliche. Persistence is not just, “Keep going till you hit the finish line.” Persistence is to keep failing until you fail no more.

Don’t try to be original.

If you try to write an original article or a story, you will never get started. There are thousands of articles out there on the same topic. They still get read.

Yours will be different because it will have your voice, your emphasis, your story. That alone will make it original. Stop looking for something new, something unique. Instead, work on your style. It is not what story you tell; it is how you tell it that makes it unique. Many mediocre writers have become successful because of their style. James Altucher mediocre writer; he himself says so. It is his tongue-in-cheek style that gives him an edge over other writers.

Tim Urban of Wait But Why blog is another mediocre writer who is immensely successful. His uniqueness lies in the in-depth articles he writes on general topics. He didn’t know how to draw, so he started drawing stick figures to illustrate his point. His ability to make strong connections between the visuals and text makes his topics even more interesting to his audience.

Don’t compare with other writers.

What kills a mediocre writer prematurely is their tendency to compare their work with others. They know they fall short, and it discourages them to the point that they can’t write anymore. I know that first hand. It took me years to get over my tendency to compare myself with other writers.

Writing is a personal thing. It is just like talking, only on paper. Some people are great conversationalists, while others have to learn the craft. Rather than comparing your work with others, compare it with your previous year’s work. If it is better, you are improving. You might still not be at the level you want to be, but you will get there.

Experiment.

Write haiku. Tell a story using just dialogues. Write non-fiction using techniques of fiction. Try different forms of writing. Writing is creative, and creativity is making connections between different seemingly unrelated things.

In Franz Kafka’s best-known work, Metamorphosis, the main character wakes up one morning finds himself inexplicably transformed into a huge insect. Can you write the story of an insect who turns into a human? Or a computer? Or a tree?

Or would you rather prefer to write interactive stories where the reader can decide in which direction the main character will go and how the story will end differently based on choices the reader makes? Michael La Ronn, relatively unknown Science fiction and fantasy writer (of more than 50 novels) wrote his first novel as an interactive novel when no one had heard of interactive stories.

Make mistakes.

Mistakes are the best way to learn. Mistakes deepen our knowledge and help us see what we didn’t see before. Mistakes also show us new possibilities. Making mistakes is not a sign of ignorance or inefficient, instead it is a sign of being adventurous and courageous. So many discoveries can be attributed to mistakes.

Learn from others.

Effective mediocres are not afraid of learning from others. It is because their ego is not connected to their work. They dissect other writers’ work to understand what works for them and try to imitate them. Imitation is the highest form of praise. It is also the most effective way to learn. But they don’t just stop at imitating. They try to look for ways to improve what they have learned from others. Since they are not trying to prove themselves as masters or experts, they have the luxury of experimenting.

Have fun.

It is hard to pursue any activity which is not fun. On the other hand, if you have fun, you can learn effortlessly and achieve much more. A child soon becomes proficient with electronic devices and can work it without any training manual. Mediocre writers, like children, have fun with their writing. They know even Shakespeare didn’t think he was writing literature which will be read and analyzed hundreds of years after he was gone. He was writing plays to entertain the masses.

Takeaways

Do you feel you are a mediocre writer too? Does that make you feel ashamed? Please don’t. Understand you belong in the middle of the bell cover along with most of the others.

But you can stand out if you choose to adopt some (or all) of these habits:

  1. Be consistent.
  2. Don’t try to be original.
  3. Don’t compare yourself with other writers.
  4. Experiment.
  5. Make mistakes.
  6. Learn from others.
  7. Have fun.

Having Trouble Building Habits

My husband goes for a walk every morning. Come hail, snow, or fires; he is out of the door at 5:30 am and has been doing that for more than 20 years. Sometimes he is out walking at 4:00 am if he wakes up early and can’t go back to sleep.

I, on the other hand, use the weather as an excuse for not going for a walk. It is either too cold or too hot; windy or stuffy, raining or fire season. And even if it is perfect weather, I will skip walks because I hadn’t finished the article I was writing or sketch I was making.

This year I decided to nail my walking habit. That led me to read all I could find about habit building.

Why can some people form habits so easily while others struggle relentlessly?

The answer came from a very unexpected source —Gretchen Rubin’s book The Four Tendencies.

Rubin explains when we try to form a new habit, we set an expectation for ourselves. Therefore it’s crucial to understand how we respond to expectations.

We face two kinds of expectations:

  1. Outer expectations, such as meeting work deadlines, observing traffic regulations. And
  2. Inner expectations, such as to write every day or keep a New Year’s resolution.

In her book, Rubin hypothesizes that in terms of responding to expectations, just about everyone falls into one of four distinct groups:

  1. Upholders
  2. Questioners
  3. Obligers
  4. Rebels

Each group responds differently to outer and inner expectations and needs to adopt different strategies to form habits.

Upholders

Upholders respond readily to both outer expectations and inner expectations. They wake up and think: “What’s on the schedule and the to-do list for today?” They want to know what’s expected of them and meet those expectations.

They avoid making mistakes or letting people down — including themselves.

Upholders can rely on themselves, and others can rely on Upholders. They’re self-directed and have little trouble meeting commitments, keeping resolutions, or meeting deadlines (they often finish early). They want to understand the rules, and often they search for the rules beyond the rules — as in the case of art or ethics.

Because Upholders feel a real obligation to meet their expectations for themselves, they have a strong instinct for self-preservation, and this helps protect them from their tendency to meet others’ expectations.

However, Upholders may struggle when expectations aren’t clear, or the rules aren’t established. They may feel compelled to meet expectations, even ones that seem pointless. They may feel uneasy when they know they’re breaking the rules, even unnecessary rules unless they work out a powerful justification to do so.

Upholders find it relatively easy to cultivate habits. Still, they too have to put a lot of effort into it. They embrace them because they find them gratifying.

Even habit-loving Upholders must struggle to foster good habits shows how challenging it is to form habits.

My husband is an Upholder, which is why he is so disciplined with his morning walks.

To my surprise, I found out; I too am an upholder. It took me just three weeks of setting up an alarm to wake up early and go for a walk. I used to write while my husband was on his walk. Now I wake up early, write and then go for a walk.

Questioners

Questioners question all expectations and will meet an expectation only if they believe it’s justified.

They’re motivated by reason, logic, and fairness. They wake up and think, “What needs to get done today, and why?” They decide for themselves whether a course of action is a good idea, and they resist doing anything that seems to lack sound purpose.

Essentially, they turn all expectations into inner expectations.

Questioners resist rules for rules’ sake.

Because Questioners like to make well-considered decisions and come to their own conclusions, they’re very intellectually engaged, and they’re often willing to do exhaustive research. If they decide there’s sufficient basis for an expectation, they’ll follow it; if not, they won’t.

Questioners resist anything that seems arbitrary. For instance, they would say, “I can keep a resolution if I think it’s important, but I wouldn’t make a New Year’s resolution because January first is a meaningless date.”

Questioners themselves sometimes wish they could accept expectations without probing them so relentlessly. Questioners often have analysis paralysis. They always want to have one more piece of information.

Questioners are motivated by sound reasons — or at least what they believe to be sound reasons. Questioners can sometimes seem like crackpots because they may reject expert opinion in favor of their own conclusions.

If Questioners believe that a particular habit is worthwhile, they’ll stick to it — but only if they’re satisfied with the habit’s usefulness.

Obligers

Obligers meet outer expectations but struggle to meet inner expectations. They’re motivated by external accountability; they wake up and think, “What must I do today?”

Because Obligers excel at meeting external demands and deadlines and go to great lengths to meet their responsibilities, they make terrific colleagues, family members, and friends.

Because Obligers resist inner expectations, it’s difficult for them to self-motivate — to work on a Ph.D. thesis, to attend networking events, to get their car serviced. Obligers depend on external accountability, with consequences such as deadlines, late fees, or the fear of letting other people down.

Obligers can sometimes do things for the sake of others that they couldn’t do for themselves.

The weight of outer expectations can make Obligers susceptible to burnout because they have trouble telling people “no.”

Obligers may find it difficult to form a habit because often we undertake habits for our own benefit, and Obligers do things more easily for others than for themselves. For them, the key is external accountability.

Rebels

Rebels resist all expectations, outer and inner alike. Instead, they choose to act from a sense of choice or freedom. Rebels wake up and think, “What do I want to do today?” They resist control, even self-control, and enjoy flouting rules and expectations.

Rebels work toward their own goals, in their own way, and while they refuse to do what they’re “supposed” to do, they can accomplish their own aims.

They place a high value on authenticity and self-determination and bring an unshackled spirit to what they do.

At times, the Rebel resistance to authority is enormously valuable to society. But Rebels often frustrate others because they can’t be asked or told to do anything.

They don’t care if people are counting on them or when told, “you said you’d do it,” or “your parents will be upset,” or “it’s against the rules,” or “this is the deadline,” or “it’s rude.” Asking or telling Rebels to do something often makes them do just the opposite.

Rebels sometimes frustrate even themselves because they can’t tell themselves what to do.

No surprise — Rebels resist habits. They value their freedom more than the benefit habits can bring. For them, freedom means no limits, and a life controlled by habits sounds like living a life of a prisoner.

Rebels resist habits, but they can embrace habit-like behaviors by tying their actions to their choices.

The world is full of Questioners and Obligers.

Most people, by a huge margin, are Questioners or Obligers. Very few are Rebels, and the Upholders category is also tiny.

Because Upholders and Rebels are such small categories, people who try to shape people’s habits on a large scale — employers, device manufacturers, insurance companies, instructors — focus on solutions that help Questioners, by providing sound reasons, and Obligers, by providing accountability.

How Four Tendencies Can Help You Build Habits

If you are a Questioner, you might need a sound reason for taking action (such as why you should write every day). Still, those logical arguments don’t matter nearly as much to an Obliger who will need external accountability.

An Upholder can lecture a Questioner on obligation — and make a Questioner less likely to meet an expectation because Questioners question all obligations.

As an Upholder, you might spend a lot of time worrying about things like knowing the rules of writing (whether a comma should be italicized in a footnote reference) and feeling inadequate when you unknowingly break them.

As a Questioners, you might feel exhausted by your own questioning, but you might think it is the most rational approach and hence stick with it.

As a Rebel, you sometimes wish to follow the rules but wouldn’t want to stop being Rebels.

But if you are an Obligers, you might resent others for their expectations, leaving you no time to meet your own expectations. But when given the opportunity, you might fail to meet them anyway.

The Four Tendencies framework is a great tool to give insight into human nature and your own nature. There was so much I didn’t know about myself before I read The Four TendenciesI didn’t know why I couldn’t take up morning walks. Because they conflicted with my other habit — writing a journal in the morning. When I started waking up early and wrote my journal first, I had no problem going for a walk.

This year I am building three more habits:

  • Write daily posts on LinkedIn. I haven’t been posting much for the past six months. I want to get back into the habit of posting every day. Regular posting not only keeps me in touch with my readers but also with the narrator in me.
  • Write articles and newsletters in batches. For example, draft 4–8 pieces in one batch, edit and schedule them in another batch. Same with newsletters.

Your Takeaway

  • Building a habit depends upon how you respond to expectations.
  • To form a new habit, you set an expectation from yourself. So you need to know how you would respond to the expectation.
  • There are two kinds of expectations — outer expectations and inner expectations.
  • We all have different tendencies, and they play an important role in how we respond to expectations.
  • Upholders respond well to both outer and inner expectations.
  • Questioners question all expectations and will meet an expectation only if they believe it’s justified.
  • Obligers meet outer expectations but struggle to meet inner expectations.
  • Rebels resist all expectations, outer and inner alike. Instead, they choose to act from a sense of choice or freedom.
  • Knowing your tendency can help you make strategies to build habits aligned with your nature.

You can take a quiz at Gretchen Rubin’s site to determine your tendency.

Stop Obsessing With Productivity

We are obsessed with productivity. I am not talking about companies; I am talking about individuals, although companies are the ones who have ingrained in us the notion that we should be efficient at all times.

Everywhere I look (myself included), I find people trying to milk more out of their day.

We have forgotten how to relax. We feel guilty about having a day off. We work during our holidays. We dread going on holiday. Going on holiday means getting behind with your schedule. You do a sh*t load of work before you go and then another sh*t load to catch up when you get back.

Why are we working so hard?

Three reasons, I believe.

We associate our value with what we produce.

According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, once we fulfill our basic physiological, safety, and love & belonging needs, we get on to meet our need for self-worth, accomplishment, and respect.

As more and more of us have fulfilled our bottom three levels of hierarchical needs, we have embarked on satisfying our self-esteem needs. We are on to make a name for ourselves, and in today’s world, it is by creating. The creator’s economy not only demands that we produce. We comply because our self-worth is associated with it.

Image Source: Simply Psychology

Image Source: Simply Psychology

We focus too much on the future.

Another reason is that we constantly focus on the future. We have been trained to think that the key to success and happiness lies in securing our future. Work more now so that you can retire early. Build a better future by being productive now to enjoy life later on. This false belief leads us to forego happiness in the present and spend the bulk of our days hunched over our computers, grinding our teeth, reassuring ourselves that the eventual payoff will be worth it.

That eventual payoff never comes. When the time comes to retire and put our feet up, we don’t know what to do with our time. So many retirees go back to work after a few months—many who don’t wither away because of a lack of purpose in their lives.

Productivity is an addiction.

Believe it or not, productivity is an addiction, and more people are getting hooked on it. As soon as you start measuring your output and know you can accomplish a certain amount of work in a certain amount of time, you raise the bar. Unfortunately, it is not just your boss at work who does it to you; your inner boss does it too.

When you are not producing, you get withdrawal symptoms just like a heroin junkie does. So you set yourself new targets. Bigger goals, tighter deadlines. Harsher punishments if you fail to meet those.

What is the solution?

The truth is that constant focus on being productive doesn’t lead to the success and satisfaction we crave. Instead, we’re stressed, tired, and perpetually unhappy, aware there’s always something more to be done.

I am retired. I have no financial need to keep on working. I have a healthy circle of friends. I have a big family. Yet I spend most of my time on the computer.

The solution is simpler than you think; instead of scheduling every minute of our calendars to accomplish something, we should slot in some rest, and doing nothing, and make peace with our limitations that we cannot achieve everything.

REST

Constant efficiency could be counter-productive. For being efficient, the focus is on accomplishing rather than enjoying. Creativity suffers because our brain doesn’t get time to make random connections.

Focused, sequential work is different from the “randomness of thought that occurs during rest,” says Andreasen Nancy C. Andreasen, chair of psychiatry at the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Creativity relies on rest and free association. Andreasen coined the term REST (random episodic silent thought) to describe the high neural activity marking states of relaxation and free association.

You are not wasting time when you are engaged in leisure activities. Instead, you are rejuvenating your body and your brain and exposing it to new ideas, and letting it make new connections.

Do Nothing

Jenny Odell, an artist and writer of the book “How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy,” argues that the fixation with productivity has warped our sense of fulfillment and growth.

“The point of doing nothing, as I define it, isn’t to return to work refreshed and ready to be more productive,” she writes, “but rather to question what we currently perceive as productive.”

Productivity is more like maintenance than creation. Practices based on solitude and observation — such as birdwatching (which Odell recommends), look like inaction but hones attention. And paying attention to things is more rewarding and fulfilling than chasing our tails while being productive.

That might seem like a “self-indulgent luxury” for people with time on their hands, Odell acknowledges, but “just because this right is denied to many people,” she writes, “doesn’t make it any less of a right or any less important.”

Accept your limitations

Oliver Burkeman, in his recent book Four Thousand Weeks, sums it up correctly — you will never be able to accomplish everything you set up for yourself, so accept your limitation and make peace with it.

I agree with him on just going with the flow, doing what feels right at each moment. Unless there is some urgency and we are forced to act, we are always doing whatever feels right in every moment, in any case. Even the most obsessive planners (including me) are still deciding, moment by moment, what to do. It’s just that the specific decision they’re making, for now, is to keep on following the plan.

What is your take on productivity?

Have you been able to plan your days, weeks, months, life?

Do you achieve whatever you have set out to achieve?

What is your conclusion?

Share with me in the comments section.

Ten Lessons Learned From Publishing My Second Book

1) You can’t write a book without a deadline.

This is primarily true with all projects, but with books, it is gospel. A book tends to get out of your hands and become a monster. Expect your brain to rebel too. It would want to do everything else but work on the book. The only way to finish a book is to hire an editor who has pre-charged you for editing and has blocked his time. The late you get with delivering your book, the less time he has to edit it, which means poor quality editing. And in case you don’t finish in time, you lose your money and your editor too. Most professional editors want to work with professional authors. So if you expect professionalism from them, you got to be professional too.

2) You are bound to struggle with your first few books.

I wrote my first book like I had my first baby. I didn’t know what to expect and just went with the flow. I made several mistakes, but it didn’t matter. But with the second one, I learned many pitfalls and still fell into them. Despite making several lists, I still wasted time and effort. Now, taking a step back, I am more accepting that I will struggle with my first few books, which is fine. Just two years ago, I struggled with writing a 1000 word article. Today I am writing a 20,000-word book a month. If I can come that far in two years, I will get better in the next two.

3) Building a backlist is of utmost importance.

Nothing sells your book like your next book. So, early in your career, you will be spending time building a backlist and learning the ins and outs of the industry. Even if nobody buys your earlier books, having a backlist establishes you as an author in the industry and prepares the ground for the sale of your future work.

4) Amazon Ads could be your friend.

When you are relatively new in the industry and don’t have a mailing list, Amazon advertisements could bring much-needed visibility to your books. Without the promotions, no one knows about your book.

You don’t have to abandon your earlier books after putting all the work into writing, editing, formatting, publishing, and launching them. Set up Amazon ads and get the visibility your book deserves. Although Amazon ads don’t chew up your advertising dollars as Facebook or Google does, they do chew up your time. There is a lot to learn in this area.

5) Book-A-Month could be a real strategy.

What writing an ‘article-a-day’ is for Medium writers; writing a ‘book-a-month’ is for Amazon writers. The rapid-releases strategy not only gives momentum to your writing practice but to the marketing of your book as well. ‘Nothing sells a book better than the next book’ is the industry clichĂ©.

It might come as a surprise to some but it is easier to write an article a day than it is to write an article once a week. The same is true for writing books. Speed brings focus and fluency.

6) Block out a week a month to write the book.

There are only four weeks in a month. So if you want to write a book in a month, you need to block out at least a week. You need to write 3000 words a day for a 21,000 words book. You will then need another week to edit it.

I wrote my first book in one week. I decided to take the weekend off with the second one and wrote it in 10 days instead. It turned out to be a better strategy as I didn’t have to postpone any weekend plans. I wrote 2000 words a day (a more manageable target) and edited the previous day’s work as I went.

7) You got to love the process.

A career as an author is not for those who want to succeed quickly. Even with rapid releases and advertising, building a backlist and readership takes a long time. You got to love the process (and writing) enough to be able to sustain for that long. Most authors who are doing well today have been writing for decades. They can do that because they love writing and the process of generating books.

8) Initially, you might have to concentrate all your energy on the task at hand.

When I got serious about writing on Medium, I stopped everything else and wrote 100 articles in 100 days to get into the rhythm of writing for the platform. I did the same for writing books. For two months, I entirely concentrated on books. I didn’t check social media, and I didn’t write on Medium. Once I established the system, and I began to get a bit more time, I started going back to the platforms I used to be active before.

9) Treat everything as an experiment.

Writing 100 articles in 100 days was an experiment. So was publishing something on three social media platforms for 100 consecutive days was an experiment. My first book was an experiment too. An experiment to see if I could write a book in a week. Writing a book a month is an experiment too, if I succeed, well and good. If I fail, no big deal. I will learn a lot during the process.

Speaking of failure, I could pull through 90 Days of Focus on Fiction back in August, neither could I keep the promise I made last week to write an article a day for December. They were just experiments. Some I was able to pull through, others I couldn’t.

Both these goals have gone to my future To-Do lists, and hopefully, I will do justice to them one day.

10) Writing a book is just one-third of the battle.

Two-third is marketing. According to The State of Indie Authorship in 2021, 79% of independent authors list marketing as the most challenging part of the publishing process. Writing the book came in second at 14%. I am finding the same. It could be that marketing is taking me away from my passion, i.e. writing, or that my marketing channels are not set as my writing process has. I will be spending more time on it in the next year.

If you like my work, you can subscribe to my newsletter at A Whimsical Writer.

Use ‘Defamiliarization’ To Find Creative Inspiration

Sister Corita Kent (1918– 1986) was a major 20th-century American artist and a charismatic teacher at Immaculate Heart College in Hollywood, California. She believed that everyone was capable of great creativity. 

Sister Corita was inspired by the bits and pieces of life around her, from billboards and newspaper headlines to international folk art. She changed the potentially stuffy classroom atmosphere into a cauldron of queries and assignments, encouraging students to question most of what they thought they knew about art and many other things.

One of Corita’s favorite teaching tools was a finder, a scrap of cardboard with a window in the middle through which students discovered design elements in unexpected places such as a supermarket, a gas station, cracks in the sidewalk. She immersed students inflow (the creative practice of observing and working with single-minded concentration ) and overflow (doing lots of it). 

Learning art Corita-style meant serious observing and serious play.

‘Defamiliarization’ is based on the same theory.

In a recent article, David Epstein, the author of the bestseller Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World talked about ‘defamiliarization’ a technique championed by Russian writers. 

It is about describing usual things in unusual ways and thus providing a different perspective on experiences we normally take for granted. 

The idea is to “reawaken our senses by making the familiar ‘unfamiliar.’

Most of us look right past familiar items, something Tony Fadell talks about in His TED Talk — “The First Secret Of Design Is
Noticing.” Tony Fadell is known for Apple’s iPod, but he is even more proud of his second act — making the household thermostat more efficient and less of an eyesore.https://neeramahajan.com/media/5ac8095d0ea48613fbf38eea39873180Source: TED Talks

After leaving Apple, Fadell traveled the world for a year and a half before settling on his next product idea. 

“I had to pull back and get out of Silicon Valley to gain perspective and see the world in a different way to then re-enter it to be able to do Nest.” —  Tony Fadell

How to practice ‘defamiliarization?’

Make a cardboard viewer

I took Sister Corita’s advice and made my own cardboard viewer went to my backyard to experiment. As I looked through the hole, the very first thing I noticed was a single rose amidst the daffodil foliage. I have several rose bushes in my backyard, but none where this one was growing. Surprised I went closer and found that this solitary bloom was coming straight from the ground and the stem has no leaves whatsoever.

Image by the author

That solitary rose gave me an idea for a story. Without the cardboard viewer, I would have completely missed it. 

Find a child

Sister Corita’s second suggestion is to find a child. A child can help you see things from a completely different perspective. If there is no child in your household she suggests borrowing one and letting him give you beginning lessons in looking.

It will take just a few minutes. Ask a child to walk from the front door of your house to the back door and closely observe his small journey. It will be full of pauses, circling, touching, and picking up in order to smell, shake, taste, rub, and scrape. His eyes won’t leave the ground, and every piece of paper, every scrap, every object along the path will be a new discovery. 

A dog does the same thing. I neither have a child nor a dog in my house. But last week, while visiting a friend of ours in Melbourne, we went for a walk with their dog. The dog stopped every few steps sniffing, exploring, looking. At first, it was annoying but then I started noticing the things he was noticing and was truly intrigued by his finds.

Change the language

Writing in a language that is not your mother tongue helps you say things in new ways. English is not my first language. After migrating to Australia, for a long time, I was still thinking in my mother tongue (Punjabi) and then translating in English. I used to think of it as a limitation but it was in fact an asset. As I didn’t know the slang and cliche, I was saying things (rather translating) in a completely different (hence fresh) way.

Japanese novelist Haruki Murakami writes his first draft in English and then translates it back into his native Japanese. Novelist Jhumpa Lahiri went a step further and abandoned her native language (English) entirely, went to Italy to learn Italian, and wrote her next novel in Italian in order to gain a new perspective.

Read backward

David Epstein narrates his experience as a fact-checker earlier in his career. He would go back through an article he was checking, ticking off each fact as he went. Invariably when he went his usual way he would unconsciously just glance over and miss some of them. 

Many times I read articles from back to front, forcing my mind to concentrate more. 

David Epstein also has a little couch in his office that faces the opposite direction of his desk chair. He flops onto that when I need a shift of perspective.

Draw rather than write

Drawing a sketch is a great way to get a point across. It is also a great way to get a different perspective. These days, when I’m stuck with my article, rather than banging my head against the same wall, I start sketching.

Write by hand

Another thing I do to get out of my temporary block is to write on a notepad rather than on the computer. Switching from computer to notepad is a great way to change perspective. I am much more fluent on notepad than on the computer.

Give advice to others

This is a cheeky one. We are much better at giving advice to others than to ourselves. So whenever you’re in need of good advice, find someone else to give advice to, and you’ll end up having a fresh perspective on your problem.

That is why it is a good idea to write inspirational and self-help articles. đŸ™‚

Takeaways

Practice ‘defamiliarization’ for creative inspiration. Some of the ways to do that are:

  • Make a cardboard viewer
  • Find a child.
  • Change the language.
  • Read backward.
  • Draw rather than write.
  • Write by hand.
  • Give advice to others.

 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 

Are thinking of writing a book but don’t seem to get time. You don’t need to block out months to write your book. You can do that in one week. That is what I did and since then have been writing my books within a week or at the most ten days.

Find out how you can do it too. For a short time, I am offering my book for free. Click here to download it.

Just An Hour A Day To Learn Something New

Why is it so hard to learn a new skill in the beginning?

When I started blogging three years ago, I struggled a lot. It was taking me 7 to 8 hours to write a post. I would get frustrated, write sentences repeatedly, try to make the paragraphs flow, and work late at night so that I could publish the damn thing.

When I started sketching, it was even worse. My skeches were terrible, and I would feel horrible posting them on Instagram.

When we try something new, we are usually terrible at it, and we know it. We get disturbed at the prospect of being horrible at something, so much so that we quit to escape from the feeling of angst.

The early times of trying something new are always challenging, but a little persistence can result in huge increases in skill. The human brain is optimized to pick up new skills extremely quickly. If we could persist and practice systematically, we can experience dramatic improvements in a very short time.

I recently started writing books. For years I was convinced that it takes at least a year to write a book. Until one fine morning, I woke up and decided to write a book. That too in one week. And I did that.

I treated the book as an experiment to learn the process of writing a book. Taking the same approach as writing blog posts, I broke the book into smaller chunks and concentrated on one chunk at a time.

In the beginning, I struggled. I was all over the place. I was writing and rewriting and had no idea what I would cover in each chapter, but as the days passed, I was beginning to develop a routine for myself.

There were times I was trying not to throw my computer across the room when I got overwhelmed but then pushing through the early frustration, I developed simple techniques to meet my daily quota of writing.

First, I figured out I only have 4 -5 productive hours a day, so I made sure I didn’t waste them. Second, I learned that if I cover the core concepts first, I can fill in the blanks with research later. Third, I realized I concentrate on the smaller chunks at a time I can go through more in the given time.

As a result, I finished my book in time to publish it within a week.

So successful was this approach that I am now using it to write a book a month.

It didn’t take me 10,000 hours to master the skill of writing and publishing my first book.

Malcolm Gladwell was the first to make Dr. K. Anders Ericsson’s 10,000 rule famous through his book Outliers. Through several examples, Gladwell found that it takes around 10 years or 10,000 hours of practice to reach the top of ultracompetitive, easily ranked performance fields, such as professional golf, music performance, or chess. In those fields, the more time you’ve spent in deliberate practice, the better you perform compared to people who have practiced fewer hours.

But there is a caveat.

Most of the time, we are not seeking to become world-class golfers or chess players. I didn’t write a New York Times bestseller in one week. I just wrote a book. My focus was on solving a problem (mine as well as my readers) and hence I wrote a useful book.

In the process, I learned a skill in one week.

To learn a new skill, you need to figure out what is the focus. In my case, the focus was on solving a problem.

If you are learning career skills, your focus may be on performing well enough to produce a result that’s meaningful to you and useful to your employer.

If you are learning personal skills such as a hobby, your focus should be on enjoying the process and having fun.

Rather than Malcolm Gladwell’s (aka Dr. K. Anders Ericsson’s) 10,000 rule, I subscribe to Josh Kaufman’s “20-Hours rule”.

Josh Kaufman, the author of The First 20 Hours: How to Learn Anything Fast states that it takes you just 20 hours of deliberate practice to learn a new skill.

The concept of the “10,000-hour rule” is very intimidating. It can serve as a barrier to learning anything. If you believe it takes that long to see results, you’re less likely to start in the first place.

And the idea of “mastery” is also a deterrent. We don’t have to “mastery” every skill we ever learn. Developing new skills in a way that allows us to perform “well enough for our own purposes.” This approach is by far the most practical approach for skill acquisition.

According to Josh Kaufman, you can learn just about anything if you commit to “deliberately practice” for 20 hours.

About 40 minutes to one hour a day is all you need to get the results you’re looking for. It is not to attain mastery or for competitive performance but to get good enough.

Jeff Kaufman suggests 10 Principles of Rapid Skill Acquisition in his book The First 20 Hours: How to Learn Anything Fast!,

  • 1. Lovable project — It’s important to pay attention to what you’re personally most interested in learning. Even if you think you “should” focus on learning something else, when you’re naturally interested in a particular skill, you’ll learn extremely quickly. So follow your interests where they lead, and avoid forcing yourself to grind through abilities you’re not interested in exploring.
  • 2. One skill at a time — Don’t choose multiple skills at the same time. Concentrate on one skill at a time and give it your full attention.
  • 3. Target performance level — Decide what you want to be able to do. It is called a “target performance level.” If you have a clear idea of how good you want to become, it’s much easier to find specific practice methods that will help you get there as quickly as possible.
  • 4. Deconstruction — Most skills are really just bundles of smaller subskills you use at the same time. Break the skill down into smaller parts. By breaking down the skill into manageable parts, you eliminate the early feelings of overwhelm and make it easier to get started.
  • 5. Critical subskills — Practice the most important subskills first. A few subskills will always be more important than others, so it makes sense to begin by practicing the things that will give you a significant increase in performance. By focusing your early practice on the most critical parts of the skill, you’ll see a dramatic increase in your performance after a few hours of practice.
  • 6. Barriers to practice — When learning a skill, there will always be barriers that interfere with the learning process. These barriers could be internal such as fear or self-doubt, or external such as distractions (a ringing phone, knock at the door, TV). Eliminate any hindrances for one hour.
  • 7. Make time — The exact amount of time it takes to acquire a new skill depends on your desired performance level — if you don’t make things harder than they really need to be, it’s not at all uncommon to reach your initial objective in a few hours.
  • 8. Fast feedback loops — Find a way to get fast feedback on your progress so that you can correct yourself quickly and stay on the path of speedy learning. You can hire a coach or take time to reflect on your mistakes and correct them.
  • 9. Short bursts — Numerous studies in the fields of motor and cognitive skill acquisition have established that the first few hours of practicing a new skill always generate the most dramatic performance improvements.
  • 10. Quantity and speed — Practice quickly and often and do not focus on achieving perfection. It’s better to recognize that you’re likely a beginner, and you shouldn’t expect yourself to be an expert from the start. By prioritizing quantity and speed, you’re less likely to get frustrated and subsequently demotivated during the initial stages of practice.

Kaufman field-tested the “First 20 Hours” on a wide variety of skills in several contexts — fine and gross motor movements, cognitive processing, personal hobbies, and professional skills.

The general pattern looks like this – when you start, you’re horrible. But you improve quickly as you learn the essential parts of the skill. After reaching a certain level of skill quickly, your rate of improvement declines, and subsequent improvement becomes much slower.

This phenomenon is called the “power law of practice,” and it’s one of the most consistent findings in skill acquisition research. According to Kaufman, this effect has been known since at least 1926, and it’s been replicated many times in studies of both physical and mental skills.

Even when you have learned a new skill, you will lose it over time if you don’t continue to practice it.

Skills deteriorate over time is a given, but it is also easy to re-acquire a skill after you’ve learned it. It usually doesn’t take much practice to bring your skills back up to past levels once you know what you’re doing. An hour or two every few months is usually sufficient to maintain your current level of performance. You’re just reconnecting parts of your brain that haven’t been connected in a while. The neural wiring is still there; it’s just a bit rusty.

Is there any skill you would like to learn?

Would you be game enough to test Josh Kaufman’s “First 20 Hours”?

I would like to hear about it here.

You can write your first book in one week. I did it. So can you. Want to know how? Just download the book and get going.